Maintaining connections with family and friends is universally acknowledged as one of the most critical factors in a person’s successful rehabilitation and eventual reentry into society. Yet, the justice system often actively hinders these connections by allowing private telecommunications companies to charge exorbitant, predatory rates for phone and video calls. This practice turns the basic human need for communication into a highly lucrative revenue stream for corporations. A critical book on prison reform frequently exposes this exploitation, detailing how the high cost of staying in touch punishes innocent families, deepens poverty, and actively undermines the rehabilitative goals of the penal system.
The Monopolisation of Facility Telecommunications
The root of this exploitation lies in the monopolistic contracts granted by state and local governments. Telecommunications providers bid for exclusive rights to operate the phone systems within correctional facilities. In exchange for this monopoly, the companies frequently offer “site commissions”—essentially kickbacks—to the government agency or the facility itself. Because the facility takes a significant cut of the profits, they are incentivised to choose the provider that charges the highest rates, not the one that offers the fairest price. This corrupt contracting system creates a captive market where incarcerated individuals and their families have absolutely no alternative but to pay whatever price is demanded.
The Devastating Financial Burden on Families
The cost of these calls falls almost entirely on the families on the outside, disproportionately affecting low-income households. A simple fifteen-minute phone call can cost upwards of ten to fifteen euros in some jurisdictions, plus hidden connection fees and charges simply for depositing money into the account. For families struggling to make ends meet, these costs quickly become unsustainable. They are forced to make impossible choices between paying rent, buying groceries, or speaking to their incarcerated loved one. The systematic extraction of wealth from already marginalised communities deepens cyclical poverty and adds a severe financial punishment to families who have committed no crime.
The Negative Impact on Rehabilitation and Reentry
When the cost of communication is prohibitively high, the inevitable result is a breakdown in family bonds. Regular contact is essential for maintaining relationships with children, coordinating future housing, and securing employment opportunities prior to release. When individuals are financially cut off from their support networks, they experience profound isolation, increased anxiety, and a higher risk of disciplinary infractions. Upon release, they often return to estranged families and zero structural support, drastically increasing the likelihood of recidivism. By pricing communication out of reach, the system actively sabotages the foundation required for successful societal reintegration.
The Rise of For-Profit Video Visitation
In recent years, the exploitation has expanded into the realm of video visitation. Many facilities have partnered with private companies to install video terminals, charging steep fees for virtual visits. Alarmingly, in many instances, the introduction of video visitation has been accompanied by the complete elimination of traditional, free, in-person visitation. This forces families to pay for low-quality, often glitchy video calls simply to see their loved ones. Replacing meaningful human contact with a monetised, subpar technological substitute is a profound ethical failure that prioritises corporate profit over the well-being and rehabilitation of the incarcerated population.
Legislative Efforts to Ensure Communication Equity
Ending this predatory practice requires aggressive legislative intervention. Progressive advocates and policymakers are fighting to pass legislation that caps the rates telecommunications companies can charge and entirely bans the practice of site commissions. Furthermore, there is a growing movement demanding that communication within correctional facilities be treated as a basic right rather than a luxury, advocating for systems where calls are provided entirely free of charge. Ensuring communication equity is a fundamental necessity for protecting families from financial ruin, supporting rehabilitation, and dismantling the exploitative corporate structures operating within the justice system.
Conclusion
The exorbitant cost of communication behind bars is an exploitative practice that drains wealth from vulnerable families and undermines the rehabilitative process. Decoupling corporate profit from the fundamental need for human connection is a critical step towards a more just and effective system.
Call to Action
To understand the hidden financial mechanisms that exploit returning citizens and their families, reading investigative literature is essential. We encourage you to explore detailed resources that advocate for fair and equitable communication access.
Visit
